1. Genital
HPV
Infection
–CDC
Fact
Sheet.
Published
July
2017.
Accessed
September
2, 2020.
https://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPV-FS-July-2017.pdf. 2. Saslow
D, et al.
American
Cancer
Society,
American
Society
for
Colposcopy
and
Cervical
Pathology,
and
American
Society
for
Clinical
Pathology
Screening
Guidelines
for the
Prevention
and Early
Detection
of
Cervical
Cancer. Am J Clin
Pathol.
2012;137:516-542. 3. Tinelli
A, et al.
HPV viral
activity
by mRNA
HPV
molecular
analysis
to screen
the
transforming
infections
in
precancer
cervical
lesions. Curr
Pharm
Biotechnol.
2009;10(8):767-771. 4. Cuschieri
K, et al.
Human
Papillomavirus
Type
Specific
DNA and
RNA
Persistence–Implications
for
Cervical
Disease
Progression
and
Monitoring.
J Med
Virol.
2004;73(1):6570.doi:10.1002/jmv.20062 5.
Szarewski A, et al.
Comparison
of
predictors
for high
grade
cervical
intraepithelial
neoplasia
in women
with
abnormal
smears. Cancer
Epidemiol
Biomarkers
Prev. 2008;17(11):3033-3042.6. Dockter
J, et al.
Clinical
performance
of the
APTIMA
HPV Assay
for the
detection
of
high-risk
HPV and
high-grade
cervical
lesions. J
Clin
Virol. 2009;45(S1):S55-S61. 7. Reuschenbach
M, et al.
Performance
of
p16INK4a-cytology,
HPV mRNA,
and HPV
DNA
testing
to
identify
high
grade
cervical
dysplasia
in women
with
abnormal
screening
results. Gynecol
Oncol.
2010;119(1):98-105. 8. Clad A,
et al.
Performance
of the
Aptima
high-risk
human
papillomavirus
mRNA
assay in
a
referral
population
in
comparison
with
Hybrid
Capture 2
and
cytology. J
Clin
Microbiol.
2011;49(3):1071-1076. 9. Ratnam
S, et al.
Aptima
HPV E6/E7
mRNA test
is as
sensitive
as Hybrid
Capture 2
assay but
more
specific
at
detecting
cervical
precancer
and
cancer. J
Clin
Microbiol.
2011;49(2):557-564.10. Aptima
HPV Assay
[package
insert].
AW-12820,
Rev.004.
San
Diego,
CA;
Hologic,
Inc.,
2017.11.
Ovestad
IT, et
al.
Comparison
of
different
commercial
methods
for HPV
detection
in
follow-up
cytology
after
ASCUS/LSIL,
prediction
of CIN2-3
in follow
up
biopsies
and
spontaneous
regression
of
CIN2-3. Gynecol
Oncol.
2011;123(2):278-283.12. Szarewski
A, et al.
Comparison
of seven
tests for
highgrade
cervical
intraepithelial
neoplasia
in women
with
abnormal
smears:
the
Predictors
2 study. J
Clin
Microbiol.
2012;
50(6):1867-1873.13. Eaton,
et al.
Comparison
of the
Aptima
HPV assay
and the
cobas HPV
test in
an ASC-US
population
[abstract].
Paper
presented
at: 28th
International
Papillomavirus
Conference.
November
30-December
6, 2017.
San Juan,
Puerto
Rico.14. Cuschieri
K, et al.
Clinical
performance
of RNA
and DNA
based HPV
testing
in a
colposcopy
setting:
Influence
of assay
target,
cut off
and age. J
Clin
Virol.
2014;59(2):104-108.15. Cubie HA,
et al.
Evaluation
of
commercial
HPV
assays in
the
context
of
post-treatment
follow-up:
Scottish
Test of
Cure
Study
(STOCS-H). J
Clin
Pathol.
2014;67(6):458-463.16. Binniker
M, et al.
Comparative
evaluation
of three
commercial
systems
for the
detection
of
high-risk
human
papillomavirus
in
cervical
and
vaginal
ThinPrep
PreservCyt
samples
with
biopsy
correlation. J
Clin
Microbiol.
2014;52(10):3763-8.17. Castle P,
et al.
Comparison
of human
papillomavirus
detection
by Aptima
HPV and
cobas HPV
Tests in
a
population
of women
referred
for
colposcopy
following
detection
of
atypical
squamous
cells of
undetermined
significance
by pap
cytology. J
Clin
Microbiol.
2015;53(4):1277-1281.18. Cuzick
J, et al.
A
comparison
of
different
human
papillomavirus
tests in
PreservCyt
versus
SurePath
in a
referral
population—PREDICTORS
4. J
Clin
Virology.
2016;82:145-151.19.Virtanen
E, et al.
Performance
of
mRNA-and
DNA-based
high-risk
human
papillomavirus
assays in
detection
of
high-grade
cervical
lesions. Acta
Obstetricia
et
Gynecologica
Scandinavica.
2017;
96(1):61-68.20. Wu
R, et al.
Human
papillomavirus
messenger
RNA assay
for
cervical
cancer
screening:
the
Shenzhen
Cervical
Cancer
Screening
Trial I.
Intl J
Gynecol
Cancer.
2010;20(8):1411-1414. 21. Monsonego
J, et al.
Evaluation
of
oncogenic
human
papillomavirus
RNA and
DNA tests
with
liquid-based
cytology
in
primary
cervical
cancer
screening:
the FASE
study. Intl
J
Cancer. 2011;129(3):691-701. 22. Iftner,
et al.
Comparison
of Aptima
and HC2
in a
routine
screening
trial in
Germany
with
follow up
[abstract].
Paper
presented
at: 28th
International
Papillomavirus
Conference;
November
30-December
6, 2012;
San Juan,
Puerto
Rico. 23. Cuzick
J, et al.
Comparing
the
performance
of six
human
papillomavirus
tests in
a
screening
population.
Br J
Cancer.
2013;108:908-913. 24. Nieves
L, et al.
Primary
cervical
cancer
screening
and
triage
using an
mRNA
human
papillomavirus
assay and
visual
inspection.Int J
Gynecol Cancer.2013;23(3):513-518. 25. Iftner T,
et al.
Head-to-Head
Comparison
of the
RNA-Based
Aptima
Human
Papillomavirus
(HPV)
Assay and
the
DNA-Based
Hybrid
Capture 2
HPV Test
in a
Routine
Screening
Population
of Women
Aged 30
to 60
Years in
Germany. J
Clin
Microbiol.
2015;53(8):2509-2516. 26. American
Society
for
Colposcopy
and
Cervical
Pathology.
2012
Updated
Consensus
Guidelines
for the
Management
of
Abnormal
Cervical
Cancer
Screening
Tests and
CancerPrecursors.J
Low Genit
Tract
Dis.2013;17(5):S1-S27. 27. Morris
BJ. Clin
Chem Lab
Med.
2005;43(11):1171-7.
doi:10.1515/
CCLM.2005.203.28. De
Sanjose
et
al.Lancet
Oncol.2010;11(11):1048-56.
doi:
10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8. 29. Wheeler
CM, et
al. J
Natl
Cancer
Inst.2009;101(7):475-87.
doi:10.1093/jnci/djn510. 30. Coutlée
F, et al. J
MedVirol.
2011;83(6):1034-41.
doi:10.1002/jmv.22081. 31. Hybrid
Capture 2
[package
insert].
#L00665.
QIAGEN,
Inc. 32.Cobas
c4800
[package
insert].
#05641268001-0N.
Roche
Molecular
Systems,
Inc. 33. Iftner
T, et al.
The
longitudinal
clinical
performance
of the
RNA-based
AHPV
Human
Papillomavirus
(HPV)
Assay in
comparison
to the
DNA-based
Hybrid
Capture 2
HPV Test
in 2
consecutive
screening
rounds
with a
6-year
interval
inGermany. J
Clin
Microbiol.
2018.
doi:10.1128/JCM.01177-18
(GAST) 34. Forslund
O, et al.
HPV-mRNA
and
HPV-DNA
detection
in
samples
taken up
to seven
years
before
dysplasia
of cervix
uteri. Int J
Cancer. 2018;
doi:
10.1002/ijc.31819